Sermon 6. Omnipotence in
Bonds
"And He went down with them, and came to
Nazareth; and was subject to them." Luke ii. 51.
{75} AT this Christmas season, when we are celebrating
those joyful mysteries which ushered in the Gospel, it
seems almost an officious intrusion upon our holiday to
engage in any exercise of the reason, even though it be
in order to enliven the devotional feelings proper to the
holy tide. It is a time of religious rest and spiritual
festivity, and even on the ground that discussion is a
kind of labour, we seem to have a right to be protected
against it. And yet, as the days go on, and thankfulness
has had free current and joy has had its fill, it seems
allowable too, to look back at length on what has been
occupying the heart, and to reason upon it. Nay, we seem
to have the highest of possible authorities for doing so;
for after two of the joyful mysteries, the third and the
fifth, the holy Virgin is said to have done this very
thing. Upon the {76} Nativity of our Lord and Saviour, the
very feast we have been celebrating, the Evangelist tells
us, "Mary kept all these words, pondering
them in her heart"; and after she had found Him in
the Temple in the midst of the Doctors, which is the
subject of this day's Gospel, "His Mother," we
are told, "kept all these words in her heart."
Surely, then, it is permitted to me, consistently with
the love and adoration due to this happy time of
Christmas, to direct your minds, my Brethren, to a
consideration which it suggests, not indeed very
recondite, on the contrary, obvious to all of us, lying
on the very face of the great Mystery, but adapted, I
think, both to strengthen the faith and to deepen the
love, with which we receive it into our hearts.
"The Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us;"
this is the glorious, unsearchable, incomprehensible
Truth, on which all our hopes for the future depend, and
which we have now been commemorating. It is the wonderful
Economy of Redemption, by which God became man, the
Highest became the lowest, the Creator took His place
among His own creatures, Power became weakness, and
Wisdom looked to men like folly. He that was rich was
made poor; the Lord of all was rejected: "He came
unto His own, and His own received Him not." This, I
say, is the grand mystery of the season, and this is the
subject on which I now propose to make one remark.
I say then, my Brethren, consider what the Divine
Being is, and what we mean, when we use His name. The
very first idea of Him, if we make the Creed our guide,
is Omnipotence: "I believe in God, the Father {77} Almighty." And if you wish to enter into this idea
of Omnipotence, and investigate what it is, trace it back
into the further mystery of a past eternity. For ages
innumerable, for infinite periods, long and long before
any creature existed, He was. When there was no creature
to exercise His power upon, still He was Omnipotent in
His very Essence, as being not sovereign merely, but
sole,as the One Being, without any greater, less,
or equal, full of all resources within, and in need of
nothing, and, though infinitely one, yet being, at the
same time, a whole infinite universe, as I may say, in
Himself;so much so that the breadth and depth and
richness and variety and splendour of this created world
which we behold, is simply nothing at all, compared to
the vastness of that Ocean of perfection which lay
concentrated in the intensity of His unity. A king of
this world, though a sovereign, though an autocrat,
depends on his subjects; but the Almighty God is
absolutely and utterly free from any necessary alliance
with His creatures. He is complete in Himself, for this
reason, if for no other, that He existed for everlasting
ages before any one of them was, and was able to do
without them for a past eternity, and then created them
all out of nothing. He borrows nothing from them; He owes
nothing whatever even to the highest of them; they, on
the contrary, owe it to Him that they are even able to
remain in their own proper nature, and they derive from
Him, moment by moment, every pulsation of their life and
every ray of such glory as they possess.
Such is the omnipotent, self-dependent God: fixed in
His own centre, and needing no point of motion or {78} vantage-ground out of Himself, whereupon to bring into
action, or to use, or to apply, His inexhaustible power.
He can make, He can unmake; He can decree and bring to
pass, He can direct, control, and resolve, absolutely
according to His will. He could create this vast material
world, with all its suns and globes, and its illimitable
spaces, in a moment. All its overwhelming multiplicity of
laws, and complexity of formations, and intricacy of
contrivances, both to originate and to accomplish, is
with Him but the work of a moment. He could destroy it
all in all its parts in a moment; in the same one moment
He could create another universe instead of it,
indefinitely more vast, more beautiful, more marvellous,
and indefinitely unlike that universe which He was
annihilating. He could bring into existence and destroy
an infinite series of such universes, each in succession
more perfect than that which immediately preceded it. He
is the Creator, too, of all the intellectual natures
which exist, whether in the heavens above, or on the
earth, or in the regions under the earth. Angels in their
nine multitudinous orders, and men in their populous
generations, good spirits and bad, saints and souls on
trial, the saved and the lost, first, He created them and
creates, each in its own time; and next, He keeps the
complete and exact tale of them all, as He keeps the
catalogue also of all the beasts, the birds, the fishes,
the reptiles, and insects, all over the earth. Not a
sparrow falls without Him; not a hair of our heads, but
He has counted it in with the rest; and so, too, not a
soul, but He has before Him its whole history from
beginning to end, and its every thought, word, and deed,
and its {79} every motion through every day, and its relative
place in the scale of merit and of sin.
And, while He thus intermingles His presence and His
operations with an ineffable intimacy of union in every
place, in every substance, in every act, everywhere, He
is at the same time, as I have said, infinitely separated
from everything, and absolutely incommunicable and
unapproachable, and self-dependent in His own glorious
Essence. Nothing can add to Him; no one can be His
creditor, no one can claim anything of Him. He has no
duties (if I may use such a term) towards the beings He
has created. It is a saying about earthly possessions,
that property has its duties as well as its privileges.
Such words and such ideas apply not to the
Self-subsisting, Everlasting God. He asks of His
creatures, "Is it not lawful for Me to do what I
will?" And St. Paul says of Him: "O man! who art thou
that repliest against God? shall the thing formed say to
Him who formed it, Why hast Thou made me thus?" If I
must still use the word "duties" or obligations
of Almighty God, I will say, that He has obligations
towards Himself, but none towards us. What binds Him is
the dictate of His own holy and perfect attributes. He is
just and true, because His attributes are such; but we
have no claims upon Him. Or, if we have claims, it is in
consequence of His own gratuitous and express promise, by
which indeed He does bind Himself; and then He is but
faithful to His own word, because He is the Truth, and
His obligation is still to Himself, and not to us. You
know, my Brethren, we, in our turn, have no duties toward
the brute creation; there is no {80} relation of justice
between them and us. Of course we are bound not to treat
them ill, for cruelty is an offence against that holy Law
which our Maker has written on our hearts, and is
displeasing to Him. But they can claim nothing at
our hands; into our hands they are absolutely delivered.
We may use them, we may destroy them at our pleasure, not
our wanton pleasure, but still for our own ends, for our
own benefit or satisfaction, provided we can give a
rational account of what we do. Now, I do not say that
the case is the same between us and our Maker, but it is
illustrated by this parallel. He has no account at all to
render to us: He has no claims of ours to settle: we are
bound to Him; He is not bound to us, except as He binds
Himself: we have no merit in His sight, and can do Him no
service, unless His promise brings these ideas into
existence. I say, He is only bound by His own perfect
Nature, infinitely good, and holy, and true, as it is;
and in that is the creature's stay. If we accuse Him, He
will prevail, according to the text, "that Thou
mayest be justified in Thy words, and mayest overcome
when Thou art judged." And if we are utterly without
claims upon Him as creatures, we are doubly destitute
considered as sinners also: and thus, if even Angels are
unprofitable in His sight, what are we?
In the words of Holy Scripture [Job iv., ix., xv.,
xxii., xxv., xxxiii.]: "Can a man be compared with
God? What doth it profit God, if thou be just? or what
dost thou give Him, if thy way be unspotted? Behold, even
the moon doth not shine, and the stars are not pure in
His sight. Behold, among His {81} saints, none is
unchangeable, and the heavens are not pure in His sight.
Behold, they that serve Him are not steadfast, and in His
Angels He found wickedness. How much more is man
abominable and unprofitable, who drinketh iniquity like
water! Behold, He taketh away, and who can hinder Him?
Who will say to Him: What dost Thou? Why dost thou strive
against Him? for He giveth not account of any of His
matters."
Such is the Omnipotence, the Self-dependence, the
Self-sufficiency, the infinite Liberty of the Eternal
God, our Creator and Judge. And now, this being so, let
me go on to the particular thought which I wish, my
Brethren, to suggest to you for your reflection at this
season.
It is, not merely that God became man, not merely
that the All-possessing became destitute; but the point
on which I shall particularly insist is, in contrast with
what I have been enlarging on, that the All-powerful, the
All-free, the Infinite, became and becomes, as the text
says, "subject" to the creature; nay, not only
a subject, but literally a captive, a prisoner, and that
not once, but on many different occasions and in many
different ways.
Now, observe, my Brethren, when the Eternal son of God
came among us, He might have taken our nature, as Adam
received it, from the earth, and have begun His human
life at mature age; He might have been moulded under the
immediate hand of the Creator; He need have known nothing
of the feebleness of infancy or the slow growth of
manhood. This might have been, {82} had He so willed; but no:
He preferred the penance of taking His place in the line
of Adam, and of being born of a woman. This was the very
scandal of the ancient heretics, as it has been of
free-thinkers in all ages. They shrank from the notion of
such a birth from Mary, as a something simply intolerable
and past belief; and truly in that belief is the
commencement of the wonderful captivity of the Infinite
God, on which I am to dwell. Yet I will not do more than
suggest so much of it to your devout meditation. I mean
the long imprisonment He had, before His birth, in the
womb of the Immaculate Mary. There was He in His human
nature, who, as God, is everywhere; there was He, as
regards His human soul, conscious from the first with a
full intelligence, and feeling the extreme irksomeness of
the prison-house, full of grace as it was.
At length He sees the light, and He is free; but free
only in that His imprisonment is changed. The very first
act of His Mother's on His birth, is both an example and
a figure of His life-long captivity. "Mary brought
forth her first-born Son, and wrapped Him up in swaddling
clothes, and laid Him in a manger." It is the custom
in those southern parts to treat the new-born babe in a
way strange to this age and country. The infant is
swathed around with cloths much resembling the
winding-sheet, the bandages and ligaments of the dead.
You may recollect, my Brethren, the account of Lazarus's
revival; how that, when miracle had lifted him up out of
the tomb, there he lay motionless, till his fastenings
were cut off from him. "He that had been dead came
forth, bound foot and hand with winding-bands; {83} and Jesus
said to them: Loose him, and let him go." So was it
with that wonder-working Lord Himself in His own infancy.
He submitted to the customs, as well as to the ritual, of
His nation; and, as He had lain so long in Mary's womb,
so now again He left that sacred prison, only that her
loving hands might manacle and fetter Him once more,
inflicting on Him the special penance which He had
chosen. And so, like some inanimate image of wood or
stone, the All-powerful lies in the manger, or on her
bosom, doubly helpless, both because His infancy is
feeble, and because His bonds are strong.
It is in this wise He was shown to the shepherds; thus
He was worshipped by the wise men; thus He was presented
in the Temple, taken up in Simeon's arms, hurried off to
Egypt by night, His tender Mother adoring the while that
abject captivity to which it was her awful duty to reduce
Him. So His first months passed; and though, as time went
on, He grew in stature, and burst His bonds, still
through a slow and tedious advance did He enter on His
adolescence. And then, when for a moment He anticipated
His mission and sat down among the Doctors in the Temple,
He was quickly recalled by His Mother's chiding, and went
back again to her and Joseph, and, in the emphatic words
of the text, was "subject unto them." It is
said, He worked at His father's trade, not even yet His
own master, and confined till the age of thirty to the
limits of one city.
And when at length the hour came for His breaking away
from His humble home and quitting Nazareth, {84} even then
this law of captivity, as I may call it, continued, and
that even with the circumstances of a frightful
development. For is it not terrifying, so as even to
scare the mind, that in His infancy indeed His Mother's
pure embrace had been His prison, but now, as a
preparation for His public ministry, He is made over to
His enemy, and undergoes the handling of the foul spirit himself! The rebel archangel, who would not be in
subjection, who had assailed the throne of God, and had
been cast out of heaven, he it is who now has got fast
hold of the Eternal Word Incarnate, and is lifting Him
up, and transporting Him according to his will; taking
Him into the holy city, and setting Him upon the pinnacle
of the Temple, and taking Him up into a very high
mountain in order to seduce Him with a bribe of the
unshackled lordship of the wide earth. "What concord
hath Christ with Belial?" Yet the fiend is allowed
the momentary possession of the Omnipotent.
But at least when He has begun to preach, He will be
free. My Brethren, it is true; but even then the
threatenings at least and the earnests of a renewed
captivity pursue Him. As soon as He does miracles and
collects followers, His brethren take the alarm, and try
to capture Him. "When His friends had heard of it,
they went out to lay hold of Him, for they said, He is
become mad." When He preached in Nazareth, "the
people rose and seized Him violently, and brought Him to
the brow of the hill, to cast Him headlong." At
another time He was in danger from His own hearers; they
went about to take Him by force to make Him a king. At
another time, "the Scribes and Pharisees {85} sent
ministers to apprehend Him." At another time, Herod
was about to seize Him and put Him to death.
At length He is to die for us; but still that
sacrifice of Himself was not to please Him, if
imprisonment was away. He allowed Himself, in the
Church's words, "manibus tradi nocentium," to
be given into the hands of the violent. Now, I ask, what
need of this superfluity of humiliation? He was to shed
His blood and die; doubtless: but in the manifold
dispositions of Providence there were many ways whereby
to die, without falling into the fierce handling of
jailers and hangmen. He might have taken upon Himself the
mode of satisfying the Divine Decree, and have dispensed
with the instrumentality of man. We read in history of
kings going to death, who refused the assistance of the
executioner, and submitted to their fate by their own
act. And it was in order to remind us that He need not
have undergone that profanation, that, on His enemies
first approaching Him, He smote them to the ground. And
again, it was in order to impress upon us that He did
undergo it, that He touchingly asked them: "Are ye
come out as to a robber, with swords and clubs, to
apprehend Me? but this is your hour and the power of
darkness."
Thus He spoke, and that expostulation was the
immediate signal for those special indignities to begin
in which He chose to invest His passion and death. He who
was submitted to the wine-press in Gethsemani, and
agonized with none to see Him but Apostles and attendant
Angels, might surely have gone through His solemn
sacrifice in solitude, as He commenced it; but {86} He
preferred the "hands of men"; He preferred the
loathsome kiss of the traitor; He preferred the staves
and swords of the ministers of a fallen priesthood; He
preferred to die in the midst of a furious mob, haling
Him to and fro; under the fists and scourges and hammers
of savage lictors; now shut up in a dungeon, now dragged
before the judgment-seat, now tied to a pillar, now
nailed to the cross, and then at length, when the worst
was over, and His soul was fled, hurried, as the best His
friends could do for Him, hurried into a narrow sepulchre
of stone. O marvellous dispensation, full of mystery!
that the God of Nature, the Lord of the Universe, should
take to Himself a body to suffer and die in; not only so,
but should not even allow Himself the birthright of man,
should refuse to be master of His own limbs, and outgrow
the necessity of a Mother's arms, only to present Himself
to the tyrannous grasp of the heathen soldiers.
And now surely, my Brethren, we are come to the end of
these wonders. He tore open the solid rock; He rose from
the tomb; He ascended on high; He is far off from the
earth; He is safe from profanation; and the soul and
body, which He assumed, partake of course, as far as
created nature allows, of the Sovereign Freedom and the
Independence of Omnipotence. It is not so: He is indeed
beyond the reach of suffering; but you anticipate, my
Brethren, what I have yet to say. Is He then so enamoured
of the prison, that He should purpose to revisit earth
again, in order that, as far as possible, He may undergo
it still? Does He set such a value on subjection to His
creatures, that, before He goes away, on the very {87} eve of
His betrayal, He must actually make provision, after
death, for perpetuating His captivity to the end of the
world? My Brethren, the great truth is daily before our
eyes: He has ordained the standing miracle of His Body
and Blood under visible symbols, that He may secure
thereby the standing mystery of Omnipotence in bonds.
He took bread, and blessed, and made it His Body; He
took wine, and gave thanks, and made it His Blood; and He
gave His priests the power to do what He had done.
Henceforth, He is in the hands of sinners once more.
Frail, ignorant, sinful man, by the sacerdotal power
given to him, compels the presence of the Highest; he
lays Him up in a small tabernacle; he dispenses Him to a
sinful people. Those who are only just now cleansed from
mortal sin, open their lips for Him; those who are soon
to return to mortal sin, receive Him into their breasts;
those who are polluted with vanity and selfishness and
ambition and pride, presume to make Him their guest; the
frivolous, the tepid, the worldly-minded, fear not to
welcome Him. Alas! alas! even those who wish to be more
in earnest, entertain Him with cold and wandering
thoughts, and quench that Love which would inflame them
with Its own fire, did they but open to It. Such are the
best of us; and then for the worst? O my Brethren, what
shall we say of sacrilege? of His reception into hearts
polluted with mortal, unforsaken sin? of those further
nameless profanations, which from time to time occur,
when unbelief dares to present itself at the Holy Altar,
and blasphemously gains possession of Him?
My Brethren, it is plain that, when we confess God {88} as
Omnipotent only, we have gained but a half-knowledge of
Him: His is an Omnipotence which can at the same time
swathe Itself in infirmity and can become the captive of
Its own creatures. He has, if I may so speak, the
incomprehensible power of even making Himself weak. We
must know Him by His names, Emmanuel and Jesus, to know
Him perfectly.
One word more before I conclude. Some persons may
consider that a thought, such as that I have been
enlarging on, is a difficulty to faith. Every one has his
own trials and his own scandals: I grant it. For me, my
Brethren, I can only say that its effect on myself lies
just in the very opposite direction, and, awful as it is,
it does but suggest an incentive, as for adoration, so
for faith also. What human teacher could thus open for us
an insight into the infinitude of the Divine Counsels?
Eye of man hath not seen the face of God; and heart of
man could never have conceived or invented so wonderful a
manifestation, as the Gospel contains, of His ineffable,
overwhelming Attributes. I believe the infinite
condescension of the Highest to be true, because it has
been imagined. Moreover, I recognize it to be true, just
as I believe in the laws of this material world,
according as human science elicits them; viz., because I
see here the silent operation, beneath the surface, of a
great principle, which is not seen till it is
investigated. I adore a truth, which, though patent to
all who look for it, yet, to be seen in its consistency
and symmetry, has to be looked for. And further, I
glory in it, for I see in it the most awful antagonism to
the very idea and essence of sin, whether as existing in
Angels or in men. For what was {89} the sin of Lucifer, but
the resolve to be his own master? What was the sin of
Adam, but impatience of subjection, and a desire to be
his own god? What is the sin of all his children, but the
movement, not of passion merely, not of selfishness, not
of unbelief, but of pride, of the heart rising against
the law of God, and set on being emancipated from its
trammels? What is the sin of Antichrist, but, as St. Paul
says, that of being "the Lawless One," of
"opposing or being lifted up against all that is
called God, or worshipped, so that he sitteth in the
temple of God, showing himself as if he were God"?
If, then, the very principle of sin is insubordination,
is there not a stupendous meaning in the fact, that He,
the Eternal, who alone is sovereign and supreme, has
given us an example in His own Person of that love of
subjection, which in Him alone is simply voluntary, but
in all creatures is an elementary duty?
O my Brethren, let us blush at our own pride and
self-will. Let us call to mind our impatience at God's
providences towards us, our wayward longings after what
cannot be, our headstrong efforts to reverse His just
decrees, our bootless conflicts with the stern
necessities which hem us in, our irritation at ignorance
or suspense about His will, our fierce, passionate
wilfulness when we see that will too clearly, our haughty
contempt of His ordinances, our determination to do
things for ourselves without Him, our preference of our
own reason to His word,the many, many shapes in
which the Old Adam shows itself, and one or other of
which our conscience tells us is our own; and let us pray
Him who is independent of us all, yet who at this season
became as {90} though our fellow and our servant, to teach us
our place in His wide universe, and to make us ambitious
only of that grace here and glory hereafter, which He has
purchased for us by His own humiliation.
(1st Sunday after Epiphany, 1857. Preached in the
University Church, Dublin.)
Top | Contents |
Works | Home
Newman Reader Works of John Henry Newman
Copyright © 2007 by The National Institute for Newman Studies. All rights reserved.
|