Discourse 17. The Glories of Mary for the
Sake of Her Son
{342} WE know, my brethren, that in the natural world nothing is
superfluous, nothing incomplete, nothing independent; but part answers
to part, and all details combine to form one mighty whole. Order and
harmony are among the first perfections which we discern in this
visible creation; and the more we examine into it, the more widely and
minutely they are found to belong to it. "All things are
double," says the Wise Man, "one against another; and He
hath made nothing defective." It is the very character and
definition of "the heavens and the earth," as contrasted
with the void or chaos which preceded them, that everything is now
subjected to fixed laws; and every motion, and influence, and effect
can be accounted for, and, were our knowledge sufficient, could be
anticipated. Moreover, it is plain, on the other hand, that it is only
in proportion to our observation and our research that this truth
becomes apparent; for though a number of things even at first sight
are seen to proceed according to an established and beautiful order,
yet in other {343} instances the law to which they are conformed is with
difficulty discovered; and the words "chance," and
"hazard," and "fortune," have come into use as
expressions of our ignorance. Accordingly, you may fancy rash and
irreligious minds who are engaged day after day in the business of the
world, suddenly looking out into the heavens or upon the earth, and
criticising the great Architect, arguing that there are creatures in
existence which are rude or defective in their constitution, and
asking questions which would but evidence their want of scientific
education.
The case is the same as regards the supernatural world. The great
truths of Revelation are all connected together and form a whole.
Every one can see this in a measure even at a glance, but to
understand the full consistency and harmony of Catholic teaching
requires study and meditation. Hence, as philosophers of this world
bury themselves in museums and laboratories, descend into mines, or
wander among woods or on the seashore, so the inquirer into heavenly
truths dwells in the cell and the oratory, pouring forth his heart in
prayer, collecting his thoughts in meditation, dwelling on the idea of
Jesus, or of Mary, or of grace, or of eternity, and pondering the
words of holy men who have gone before him, till before his mental
sight arises the hidden wisdom of the perfect, "which God
predestined before the world unto our glory," and which He
"reveals unto them by His Spirit". And, as ignorant men may
dispute the beauty and harmony of the visible creation, so men, who
for six days in the week are absorbed in worldly toil, who live for
wealth, {344} or name, or self-indulgence, or profane knowledge, and do but
give their leisure moments to the thought of religion, never raising
their souls to God, never asking for His enlightening grace, never
chastening their hearts and bodies, never steadily contemplating the
objects of faith, but judging hastily and peremptorily according to
their private views or the humour of the hour; such men, I say, in
like manner, may easily, or will for certain, be surprised and shocked
at portions of revealed truth, as if strange, or harsh, or extreme, or
inconsistent, and will in whole or in part reject it.
I am going to apply this remark to the subject of the prerogatives
with which the Church invests the Blessed Mother of God. They are
startling and difficult to those whose imagination is not accustomed
to them, and whose reason has not reflected on them; but the more
carefully and religiously they are dwelt on, the more, I am sure, will
they be found essential to the Catholic faith, and integral to the
worship of Christ. This simply is the point which I shall insist on—disputable
indeed by aliens from the Church, but most clear to her children—that
the glories of Mary are for the sake of Jesus; and that we praise and
bless her as the first of creatures, that we may confess Him as our
sole Creator.
When the Eternal Word decreed to come on earth, He did not purpose,
He did not work, by halves; but He came to be a man like any of us, to
take a human soul and body, and to make them His own. He did not come
in a mere apparent or accidental form, as Angels appear to men; nor
did He merely over-shadow {345} an existing man, as He overshadows His
saints, and call Him by the name of God; but He "was made
flesh". He attached to Himself a manhood, and became as really
and truly man as He was God, so that henceforth He was both God and
man, or, in other words, He was One Person in two natures, divine and
human. This is a mystery so marvellous, so difficult, that faith alone
firmly receives it; the natural man may receive it for a while, may
think he receives it, but never really receives it; begins, as soon as
he has professed it, secretly to rebel against it, evades it, or
revolts from it. This he has done from the first; even in the lifetime
of the beloved disciple men arose who said that our Lord had no body
at all, or a body framed in the heavens, or that He did not suffer,
but another suffered in His stead, or that He was but for a time
possessed of the human form which was born and which suffered, coming
into it at its baptism, and leaving it before its crucifixion, or,
again, that He was a mere man. That "in the beginning was the
Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God, and the Word
was made flesh and dwelt among us," was too hard a thing for the
unregenerate reason.
The case is the same at this day; mere Protestants have seldom any
real perception of the doctrine of God and man in one Person. They
speak in a dreamy, shadowy way of Christ's divinity; but, when their
meaning is sifted, you will find them very slow to commit themselves
to any statement sufficient to express the Catholic dogma. They will
tell you at once, that the subject is not to be inquired into, for
that it is {346} impossible to inquire into it at all without being
technical and subtile. Then, when they comment on the Gospels, they
will speak of Christ, not simply and consistently as God, but as a
being made up of God and man, partly one and partly the other, or
between both, or as a man inhabited by a special Divine presence.
Sometimes they even go on to deny that He was in heaven the Son of
God, saying that He became the Son when He was conceived of the Holy
Ghost; and they are shocked, and think it a mark both of reverence and
good sense to be shocked, when they hear the Man spoken of simply and
plainly as God. They cannot bear to have it said, except as a figure
or mode of speaking, that God had a human body, or that God suffered;
they think that the "Atonement," and "Sanctification
through the Spirit," as they speak, is the sum and substance of
the Gospel, and they are shy of any dogmatic expression which goes
beyond them. Such, I believe, is the ordinary character of the
Protestant notions among us as to the divinity of Christ, whether
among members of the Anglican communion, or dissenters from it,
excepting a small remnant of them.
Now, if you would witness against these unchristian opinions, if
you would bring out distinctly and beyond mistake and evasion, the
simple idea of the Catholic Church that God is man, could you do it
better than by laying down in St. John's words that "God became
man"? and again could you express this more emphatically and
unequivocally than by declaring that He was born a man, or that He had
a Mother? The world {347} allows that God is man; the
admission costs it little, for God is everywhere, and (as it may say)
is everything; but it shrinks from confessing that God is the Son of
Mary. It shrinks, for it is at once confronted with a severe fact,
which violates and shatters its own unbelieving view of things; the
revealed doctrine forthwith takes its true shape, and receives an
historical reality; and the Almighty is introduced into His own world
at a certain time and in a definite way. Dreams are broken and shadows
depart; the Divine truth is no longer a poetical expression, or a
devotional exaggeration, or a mystical economy, or a mythical
representation. "Sacrifice and offering," the shadows of the
Law, "Thou wouldest not, but a body hast Thou fitted to me."
"That
which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen
with our eyes, which we have diligently looked upon, and our hands
have handled," "That which we have seen and have heard,
declare we unto you";—such is the record of the Apostle, in
opposition to those "spirits" which denied that "Jesus
Christ had appeared in the flesh," and which
"dissolved" Him by denying either His human nature or His
divine. And the confession that Mary is Deipara, or the Mother
of God, is that safeguard wherewith we seal up and secure the doctrine
of the Apostle from all evasion, and that test whereby we detect all
the pretences of those bad spirits of "Antichrist which have gone
out into the world". It declares that He is God; it implies that
He is man; it suggests to us that He is God still, though He has
become man, and that He is true man {348} though He is God. By witnessing to
the process of the union, it secures the reality of the two subjects
of the union, of the divinity and of the manhood. If Mary is the
Mother of God, Christ must be literally Emmanuel, God with us. And
hence it was, that, when time went on, and the bad spirits and false
prophets grew stronger and bolder, and found a way into the Catholic
body itself, then the Church, guided by God, could find no more
effectual and sure way of expelling them than that of using this word Deipara
against them; and, on the other hand, when they came up again from the
realms of darkness, and plotted the utter overthrow of Christian faith
in the sixteenth century, then they could find no more certain
expedient for their hateful purpose than that of reviling and
blaspheming the prerogatives of Mary, for they knew full well that, if
they could once get the world to dishonour the Mother, the dishonour
of the Son would follow close. The Church and Satan agreed together in
this, that Son and Mother went together; and the experience of three
centuries has confirmed their testimony, for Catholics who have
honoured the Mother, still worship the Son, while Protestants, who now
have ceased to confess the Son, began then by scoffing at the Mother.
You see, then, my brethren, in this particular, the harmonious
consistency of the revealed system, and the bearing of one doctrine
upon another; Mary is exalted for the sake of Jesus. It was fitting
that she, as being a creature, though the first of creatures, should
have an office of ministration. She, as others, {349} came into the world to
do a work, she had a mission to fulfil; her grace and her glory are
not for her own sake, but for her Maker's; and to her is committed the
custody of the Incarnation; this is her appointed office,—"A
Virgin shall conceive, and bear a Son, and they shall call His Name
Emmanuel". As she was once on earth, and was personally the
guardian of her Divine Child, as she carried Him in her womb, folded
Him in her embrace, and suckled Him at her breast, so now, and to the
latest hour of the Church, do her glories and the devotion paid her
proclaim and define the right faith concerning Him as God and man.
Every church which is dedicated to her, every altar which is raised
under her invocation, every image which represents her, every litany
in her praise, every Hail Mary for her continual memory, does but
remind us that there was One who, though He was all-blessed from all
eternity, yet for the sake of sinners, "did not shrink from the
Virgin's womb". Thus she is the Turris Davidica, as the
Church calls her, "the Tower of David"; the high and strong
defence of the King of the true Israel; and hence the Church also
addresses her in the Antiphon, as having "alone destroyed all
heresies in the whole world".
And here, my brethren, a fresh thought opens upon us, which is
naturally implied in what has been said. If the Deipara is to
witness of Emmanuel, she must be necessarily more than the Deipara.
For consider; a defence must be strong in order to be a defence; a
tower must be, like that Tower of David, "built with
bulwarks"; "a thousand bucklers hang upon it, all {350} the armour
of valiant men". It would not have sufficed, in order to bring
out and impress on us the idea that God is man, had His Mother been an
ordinary person. A mother without a home in the Church, without
dignity, without gifts, would have been, as far as the defence of the
Incarnation goes, no mother at all. She would not have remained in the
memory, or the imagination of men. If she is to witness and remind the
world that God became man, she must be on a high and eminent station
for the purpose. She must be made to fill the mind, in order to
suggest the lesson. When she once attracts our attention, then, and
not till then, she begins to preach Jesus. "Why should she have
such prerogatives," we ask, "unless He be God? and what must
He be by nature, when she is so high by grace?" This is why she
has other prerogatives besides, namely, the gifts of personal purity
and intercessory power, distinct from her maternity; she is personally
endowed that she may perform her office well; she is exalted in
herself that she may minister to Christ.
For this reason, she has been made more glorious in her person than
in her office; her purity is a higher gift than her relationship to
God. This is what is implied in Christ's answer to the woman in the
crowd, who cried out, when He was preaching, "Blessed is the womb
that bare Thee, and the breasts which Thou hast sucked". He
replied by pointing out to His disciples a higher blessedness;
"Yea, rather, blessed," He said, "are they who hear the
word of God and keep it". You know, my brethren, that Protestants
{351} take these words in disparagement of our Lady's greatness, but they
really tell the other way. For consider them; He lays down a
principle, that it is more blessed to keep His commandments than to be
His Mother; but who, even of Protestants, will say that she did not
keep His commandments? She kept them surely, and our Lord does but say
that such obedience was in a higher line of privilege than her being
His Mother; she was more blessed in her detachment from creatures, in
her devotion to God, in her virginal purity, in her fulness of grace,
than in her maternity. This is the constant teaching of the Holy
Fathers: "More blessed was Mary," says St. Augustine,
"in receiving Christ's faith, than in conceiving Christ's
flesh;" and St. Chrysostom declares, that she would not have been
blessed, though she had borne Him in the body, had she not heard the
word of God and kept it. This, of course, is an impossible case; for
she was made holy, that she might be made His Mother, and the two
blessednesses cannot be divided. She who was chosen to supply flesh
and blood to the Eternal Word, was first filled with grace in soul and
body; still, she had a double blessedness, of office and of
qualification for it, and the latter was the greater. And it is on
this account that the Angel calls her blessed; "Full of grace,"
he says, "Blessed among women"; and St. Elizabeth also,
when she cries out, "Blessed thou that hast believed".
Nay, she herself bears a like testimony, when the Angel announced to
her the high favour which was coming on her. Though all Jewish women
in each successive age had been hoping {352} to be Mother of the Christ, so
that marriage was honourable among them, childlessness a reproach, she
alone had put aside the desire and the thought of so great a dignity.
She, who was to bear the Christ, gave no welcome to the great
announcement that she was to bear Him; and why did she thus act
towards it? because she had been inspired, the first of woman-kind, to
dedicate her virginity to God, and she did not welcome a privilege
which seemed to involve a forfeiture of her vow. How shall this be,
she asked, seeing I am to live separate from man? Nor, till the Angel
told her that the conception would be miraculous and from the Holy
Ghost, did she put aside her "trouble" of mind, recognise
him securely as God's messenger, and bow her head in awe and
thankfulness to God's condescension.
Mary then is a specimen, and more than a specimen, in the purity of
her soul and body, of what man was before his fall, and what he would
have been, had he risen to his full perfection. It had been hard, it
had been a victory for the Evil One, had the whole race passed away,
nor any one instance in it occurred to show what the Creator had
intended it to be in its original state. Adam, you know, was created
in the image and after the likeness of God; his frail and imperfect
nature, stamped with a Divine seal, was supported and exalted by an
indwelling of Divine grace. Impetuous passion did not exist in him,
except as a latent element and a possible evil; ignorance was
dissipated by the clear light of the Spirit; and reason, sovereign
over every motion of his soul, was simply subjected to the {353} will of
God. Nay, even his body was preserved from every wayward appetite and
affection, and was promised immortality instead of dissolution. Thus
he was in a supernatural state; and, had he not sinned, year after
year would he have advanced in merit and grace, and in God's favour,
till he passed from paradise to heaven. But he fell; and his
descendants were born in his likeness; and the world grew worse
instead of better, and judgment after judgment cut off generations of
sinners in vain, and improvement was hopeless; "because man was
flesh," and, "the thoughts of his heart were bent upon evil
at all times."
However, a remedy had been determined in heaven; a Redeemer was at
hand; God was about to do a great work, and He purposed to do it
suitably; "where sin abounded, grace was to abound more".
Kings of the earth, when they have sons born to them, forthwith
scatter some large bounty, or raise some high memorial; they honour
the day, or the place, or the heralds of the auspicious event, with
some corresponding mark of favour; nor did the coming of Emmanuel
innovate on the world's established custom. It was a season of grace
and prodigy, and these were to be exhibited in a special manner in the
person of His Mother. The course of ages was to be reversed; the
tradition of evil was to be broken; a gate of light was to be opened
amid the darkness, for the coming of the Just;—a Virgin conceived
and bore Him. It was fitting, for His honour and glory, that she, who
was the instrument of His bodily presence, should {354} first be a miracle
of His grace; it was fitting that she should triumph, where Eve had
failed, and should "bruise the serpent's head" by the
spotlessness of her sanctity. In some respects, indeed, the curse was
not reversed; Mary came into a fallen world, and resigned herself to
its laws; she, as also the Son she bore, was exposed to pain of soul
and body, she was subjected to death; but she was not put under the
power of sin. As grace was infused into Adam from the first moment of
his creation, so that he never had experience of his natural poverty,
till sin reduced him to it; so was grace given from the first in still
ampler measure to Mary, and she never incurred, in fact, Adam's
deprivation. She began where others end, whether in knowledge or in
love. She was from the first clothed in sanctity, destined for
perseverance, luminous and glorious in God's sight, and incessantly
employed in meritorious acts, which continued till her last breath.
Hers was emphatically "the path of the just, which, as the
shining light, goeth forward and increaseth even to the perfect
day"; and sinlessness in thought, word, and deed, in small things
as well as great, in venial matters as well as grievous, is surely but
the natural and obvious sequel of such a beginning. If Adam might have
kept himself from sin in his first state, much more shall we expect
immaculate perfection in Mary.
Such is her prerogative of sinless perfection, and it is, as her
maternity, for the sake of Emmanuel; hence she answered the Angel's
salutation, Gratia plena, with the humble acknowledgment, Ecce
ancilla Domini; {355} "Behold the handmaid of the Lord". And
like to this is her third prerogative, which follows both from her
maternity and from her purity, and which I will mention as completing
the enumeration of her glories. I mean her intercessory power. For, if
"God heareth not sinners, but if a man be a worshipper of Him,
and do His will, him He heareth"; if "the continual prayer
of a just man availeth much"; if faithful Abraham was required to
pray for Abimelech, "for he was a prophet"; if patient Job
was to "pray for his friends," for he had "spoken right
things before God"; if meek Moses, by lifting up his hands,
turned the battle in favour of Israel against Amalec; why should we
wonder at hearing that Mary, the only spotless child of Adam's seed,
has a transcendent influence with the God of grace? And if the
Gentiles at Jerusalem sought Philip, because he was an Apostle, when
they desired access to Jesus, and Philip spoke to Andrew, as still
more closely in our Lord's confidence, and then both came to Him, is
it strange that the Mother should have power with the Son, distinct in
kind from that of the purest angel and the most triumphant saint? If
we have faith to admit the Incarnation itself, we must admit it in its
fulness; why then should we start at the gracious appointments which
arise out of it, or are necessary to it, or are included in it? If the
Creator comes on earth in the form of a servant and a creature, why
may not His Mother, on the other hand, rise to be the Queen of heaven,
and be clothed with the sun, and have the moon under her feet? {356}
I am not proving these doctrines to you, my brethren; the evidence
of them lies in the declaration of the Church. The Church is the
oracle of religious truth, and dispenses what the apostles committed
to her in every time and place. We must take her word, then, without
proof, because she is sent to us from God to teach us how to please
Him; and that we do so is the test whether we be really Catholics or
no. I am not proving then what you already receive, but I am showing
you the beauty and the harmony, in one out of many instances, of the
Church's teaching; which are so well adapted, as they are divinely
intended, to recommend that teaching to the inquirer and to endear it
to her children. One word more, and I have done; I have shown you how
full of meaning are the truths themselves which the Church teaches
concerning the Most Blessed Virgin, and now consider how full of
meaning also has been the Church's dispensation of them.
You will find, that, in this respect, as in Mary's prerogatives
themselves, there is the same careful reference to the glory of Him
who gave them to her. You know, when first He went out to preach, she
kept apart from Him; she interfered not with His work; and, even when
He was gone up on high, yet she, a woman, went not out to preach or
teach, she seated not herself in the Apostolic chair, she took no part
in the priest's office; she did but humbly seek her Son in the daily
Mass of those, who, though her ministers in heaven, were her superiors
in the Church on earth. Nor, when she and they had left this lower
scene, and she was a Queen upon her Son's right hand, not even {357} then
did she ask of Him to publish her name to the ends of the world, or to
hold her up to the world's gaze, but she remained waiting for the
time, when her own glory should be necessary for His. He indeed had
been from the very first proclaimed by Holy Church, and enthroned in
His temple, for He was God; ill had it beseemed the living Oracle of
Truth to have withholden from the faithful the very object of their
adoration; but it was otherwise with Mary. It became her, as a
creature, a mother, and a woman, to stand aside and make way for the
Creator, to minister to her Son, and to win her way into the world's
homage by sweet and gracious persuasion. So when His name was
dishonoured, then it was that she did Him service; when Emmanuel was
denied, then the Mother of God (as it were) came forward; when
heretics said that God was not incarnate, then was the time for her
own honours. And then, when as much as this had been accomplished, she
had done with strife; she fought not for herself. No fierce
controversy, no persecuted confessors, no heresiarch, no anathema,
were necessary for her gradual manifestation; as she had increased day
by day in grace and merit at Nazareth, while the world knew not of
her, so has she raised herself aloft silently, and has grown into her
place in the Church by a tranquil influence and a natural process. She
was as some fair tree, stretching forth her fruitful branches and her
fragrant leaves, and overshadowing the territory of the saints. And
thus the Antiphon speaks of her: "Let thy dwelling be in Jacob,
and thine inheritance in Israel, and {358} strike thy roots in My
elect". Again, "And so in Sion was I established, and in the
holy city I likewise rested, and in Jerusalem was my power. And I took
root in an honourable people, and in the glorious company of the
saints was I detained. I was exalted like a cedar in Lebanus, and as a
cypress in Mount Sion; I have stretched out my branches as the
terebinth, and my branches are of honour and grace." Thus was she
reared without hands, and gained a modest victory, and exerts a gentle
sway, which she has not claimed. When dispute arose about her among
her children, she hushed it; when objections were urged against her,
she waived her claims and waited; till now, in this very day, should
God so will, she will win at length her most radiant crown, and,
without opposing voice, and amid the jubilation of the whole Church,
she will be hailed as immaculate in her conception.
Such art thou, Holy Mother, in the creed and in the worship of the
Church, the defence of many truths, the grace and smiling light of
every devotion. In thee, O Mary, is fulfilled, as we can bear it, an
original purpose of the Most High. He once had meant to come on earth
in heavenly glory, but we sinned; and then He could not safely visit
us, except with a shrouded radiance and a bedimmed Majesty, for He was
God. So He came Himself in weakness, not in power; and He sent thee, a
creature, in His stead, with a creature's comeliness and lustre suited
to our state. And now thy very face and form, dear Mother, speak to us
of the Eternal; not like earthly beauty, dangerous to look upon, but
like the morning star, which is thy {359} emblem, bright and musical,
breathing purity, telling of heaven, and infusing peace. O harbinger
of day! O hope of the pilgrim! lead us still as thou hast led; in the
dark night, across the bleak wilderness, guide us on to our Lord
Jesus, guide us home.
Maria, mater gratić, |
Dulcis parens clementić, |
Tu nos ab hoste protege |
Et mortis horâ suscipe. |
Top | Contents | Works
| Home
Newman Reader Works of John Henry Newman
Copyright © 2007 by The National Institute for Newman Studies. All rights reserved.
|